Trusts & Estates
Putting Personal Residences into an FLP or FLLC: A No-No
By: Jeffrey R. Matsen, Esq.
The question of whether or not a personal family residence should be placed into a Family Limited Partnership (“FLP”) or Family Limited Liability Company (“FLLC”) is a frequent topic for discussion. The impetus for such a decision is based on the theory that the FLP or FLLC affords the owner a degree of asset protection against personal liability because a creditor is allegedly limited to a Charging Order Remedy when trying to get at the assets inside the FLP or FLLC. A Charging Order limits the creditor to a distribution right rather than the ability to seize the assets themselves within the FLP or FLLC. Whether or not the Charging Order Remedy really effectively precludes a creditor from getting to the assets of the FLP or FLLC is a question which I have addressed in other articles. In any case, a creditor does normally have a more difficult time getting to assets that are inside an FLP or an FLLC than if they are held in the owner’s individual name.
To read more about strategies for personal family residences within an estate plan, please complete the form below.
Complete the form to get your free guide
Related Resources
Preservation of S-Corp Status in Trust Administration
Download the article to find out why it is critical to examine how to preserve S-corp status at all stages of the estate planning life cycle.
Learn More
Adapt Your Law Practice Checklist
In light of COVID-19, see how you can adapt your law practice with this free checklist.
Learn More
A House Divided: Deadlock in a 50-50 Partnership
Read about the destructive consequences that can emerge if a partnership agreement lacks provisions for resolving such an impasse and learn what you can do to help your business clients avoid this type of situation by reading, “A House Divided: Deadlock in a 50-50 Partnership.”
Learn More