Trusts & Estates
Attorney Liability: Estate Planning and the Strict Privity Rule
by Jennifer L. Villier, JD | Business Law Faculty, WealthCounsel
The strict privity rule has long protected estate planning attorneys from lawsuits brought against them by disappointed beneficiaries. While some states have crafted broader exceptions to strict privity in the estate planning context, a recent decision by the Colorado Supreme Court indicates that strict privity, with a narrow exception, is here to stay.
While this case only concerns Colorado attorneys, the opinion is also helpful to practitioners in other states as well and highlights several key best practices when dealing with non-clients to protect the client's wishes — and the attorney from potential litigation.
Please download this Insight Brief to learn more about Baker v. Wood, Ris & Hames, 2016 CO 5, No. 13SC554 (January 19, 2016) and its implications for trusts and estates planning attorneys.
Topics
Complete the form to get your free guide
Related Resources
2024 Estate Planning Industry Trends Report
Don't miss your chance to stay at the forefront of the estate planning industry. Download the full report for free by submitting the form on this page, and be well-prepared for current opportunities and challenges.
Learn MoreWealthCounsel Quarterly, Volume 18, No. 3—Client-Focused Planning Considerations
This issue of the WealthCounsel Quarterly highlights some essential but often overlooked estate planning documents that young adults should have in place as they venture outside their parents' homes to establish independent lives, whether starting their first year of college or beginning careers.
Learn MoreWealthCounsel Quarterly, Volume 18, No. 2—Business Succession Planning
This issue of the WealthCounsel Quarterly has a focus on business planning, this issue provides practical advice for estate planners on business succession and the transfer of business interests.
Learn More